Legislature(2001 - 2002)

2001-04-09 Senate Journal

Full Journal pdf

2001-04-09                     Senate Journal                      Page 1022
HB 104                                                                                            
SENATE CS FOR CS FOR HOUSE BILL NO. 104(FIN) "An Act                                                
making appropriations for the operating and capital expenses of the                                 
state's integrated comprehensive mental health program; making                                      
appropriations under art. IX, sec. 17(c), Constitution of the State of                              
Alaska, from the constitutional budget reserve fund; and providing for                              
an effective date" was read the third time.                                                         
                                                                                                    
Senator Elton moved that the bill be returned to second reading for the                             
purpose of a specific amendment, that being Amendment No. 1.                                        
Objections were heard, then withdrawn. There being no further                                       
objection, the bill was returned to second reading.                                                 

2001-04-09                     Senate Journal                      Page 1023
Senators Elton, Davis, Ellis, Hoffman, Olson, Lincoln offered                                       
Amendment No. 1 :                                                                                    
                                                                                                    
Page 9, lines 4 - 10, following "purpose:"                                                          
 Delete: "No money appropriated in this appropriation may be                                        
expended as payment for an abortion unless the physician services                                   
invoice is accompanied by certification that the (1) life of the mother                             
would be endangered if the pregnancy were carried to term, or (2)                                   
pregnancy is the result of an act of rape or incest. This statement is a                            
statement of the purpose of the appropriations made in this section and                             
is neither a condition attached to those appropriations nor a statement                             
of legislative intent."                                                                             
                                                                                                    
Page 11, line 24                                                                                    
 Delete: "CBR Mental Health"                                                                        
 Insert  "General Fund"                                                                             
                                                                                                    
Page 11, lines 30 - 31                                                                              
 Delete: "No money appropriated in this appropriation may be                                        
expended as payment for an abortion unless the physician services                                   
invoice is accompanied by certification that the (1) life of the mother                             
would be endangered if the pregnancy were carried to term, or (2)                                   
pregnancy is the result of an act of rape or incest. This statement is a                            
statement of the purpose of the appropriations made in this section and                             
is neither a condition attached to those appropriations nor a statement                             
of legislative intent."                                                                             
                                                                                                    
Page 12, lines 1 - 5                                                                                
 Delete: "No money appropriated in this appropriation may be                                        
expended as payment for an abortion unless the physician services                                   
invoice is accompanied by certification that the (1) life of the mother                             
would be endangered if the pregnancy were carried to term, or (2)                                   
pregnancy is the result of an act of rape or incest. This statement is a                            
statement of the purpose of the appropriations made in this section and                             
is neither a condition attached to those appropriations nor a statement                             
of legislative intent."                                                                             
                                                                                                    
Page 13, lines 3 - 6                                                                                
Delete all material.                                                                                
                                                                                                    
Page 13, lines 7 - 10                                                                               
Delete all material.                                                                                

2001-04-09                     Senate Journal                      Page 1024
Senator Elton moved for the adoption of Amendment No. 1. Senator                                    
Kelly objected.                                                                                     
                                                                                                    
The question being: "Shall Amendment No. 1 be adopted?" The roll                                    
was taken with the following result:                                                                
                                                                                                    
SCS CSHB 104(FIN)                                                                                   
Second Reading                                                                                      
Amendment No. 1                                                                                     
                                                                                                    
YEAS:  6   NAYS:  14   EXCUSED:  0   ABSENT:  0                                                   
                                                                                                    
Yeas:  Davis, Ellis, Elton, Hoffman, Lincoln, Olson                                                 
                                                                                                    
Nays:  Austerman, Cowdery, Donley, Green, Halford, Kelly, Leman,                                    
Pearce, Phillips, Taylor, Therriault, Torgerson, Ward, Wilken                                       
                                                                                                    
Austerman changed from "Yea" to "Nay".                                                              
                                                                                                    
and so, Amendment No. 1 failed.                                                                     
                                                                                                    
SENATE CS FOR CS FOR HOUSE BILL NO. 104(FIN) was                                                    
automatically in third reading.                                                                     
                                                                                                    
The question being: "Shall SENATE CS FOR CS FOR HOUSE BILL                                          
NO. 104(FIN) "An Act making appropriations for the operating and                                    
capital expenses of the state's integrated comprehensive mental health                              
program; making appropriations under art. IX, sec. 17(c), Constitution                              
of the State of Alaska, from the constitutional budget reserve fund; and                            
providing for an effective date" pass the Senate?" The roll was taken                               
with the following result:                                                                          
                                                                                                    
SCS CSHB 104(FIN)                                                                                   
Third Reading - Final Passage                                                                       
                                                                                                    
YEAS:  12   NAYS:  8   EXCUSED:  0   ABSENT:  0                                                   
                                                                                                    
Yeas:  Austerman, Cowdery, Donley, Green, Halford, Kelly, Leman,                                    
Phillips, Taylor, Therriault, Ward, Wilken                                                          
                                                                                                    
Nays:  Davis, Ellis, Elton, Hoffman, Lincoln, Olson, Pearce,                                        
Torgerson                                                                                           
                                                                                                    
Olson changed from "Yea" to "Nay".                                                                  
                                                                                                    

2001-04-09                     Senate Journal                      Page 1025
and so, SENATE CS FOR CS FOR HOUSE BILL NO. 104(FIN)                                                
passed the Senate.                                                                                  
                                                                                                    
Senator Leman moved for the adoption of the effective date clause.                                  
                                                                                                    
The question being: "Shall the effective date clause be adopted?" The                               
roll was taken with the following result:                                                           
                                                                                                    
SCS CSHB 104(FIN)                                                                                   
Effective Date Clause                                                                               
                                                                                                    
YEAS:  20   NAYS:  0   EXCUSED:  0   ABSENT:  0                                                   
                                                                                                    
Yeas:  Austerman, Cowdery, Davis, Donley, Ellis, Elton, Green,                                      
Halford, Hoffman, Kelly, Leman, Lincoln, Olson, Pearce, Phillips,                                   
Taylor, Therriault, Torgerson, Ward, Wilken                                                         
                                                                                                    
and so, the effective date clause was adopted.                                                      
                                                                                                    
Senator Leman moved for the adoption of the constitutional budget                                   
reserve fund sections.                                                                              
                                                                                                    
The question being: "Shall the constitutional budget reserve fund                                   
sections (Article IX, Section 17(c) Constitution of the State of Alaska)                            
be adopted?" The roll was taken with the following result:                                          
                                                                                                    
SCS CSHB 104(FIN)                                                                                   
Constitutional Budget Reserve Fund Sections                                                         
                                                                                                    
YEAS:  14   NAYS:  6   EXCUSED:  0   ABSENT:  0                                                   
                                                                                                    
Yeas:  Austerman, Cowdery, Donley, Green, Halford, Kelly, Leman,                                    
Pearce, Phillips, Taylor, Therriault, Torgerson, Ward, Wilken                                       
                                                                                                    
Nays:  Davis, Ellis, Elton, Hoffman, Lincoln, Olson                                                 
                                                                                                    
and so, the constitutional budget reserve fund sections failed to be                                
adopted, and SENATE CS FOR CS FOR HOUSE BILL NO.                                                    
104(FIN)(brf sup maj fld S) was referred to the Secretary for                                       
engrossment.